IN DEFENSE OF SCRIPT CONSULTANTS

There are some bad script consultants.

But there are also people like me who have read thousands of scripts and who know more about how to fix your script than your mother, best friend or even another writer.

I think coverage—a few pages outlining a script’s problems—is a limited tool. It’s a litmus test: good or bad. I try to price myself out of doing coverage, because I don’t think it helps writers improve their scripts. On my pricing page, I refer you to a respected service that does it for about half my rate.

What I do is dig into your script, pull its heart out and discuss it with you. And together we figure out how to fix its problems. My background as a development exec, writer, director and editor allows me to approach your script from many different angles.

As a dramaturg, I will ask these types of questions about your obligatory scene (climax):
Does it contain the purest form of the one dilemma your main character has been struggling with?
Does it succinctly express the theme?
Is there adequate setup earlier in the movie—with taglines, dialogue, subplots, foreshadowing—which clarifies the thematic intention of the climax?
Does the resolution waste any time? And is it consistent with your thematic intent?
Does the end of the second act unify the character’s need and goal into the climax’s one concise action?
Is it absolutely clear that the main character could not have made the climactic choice at any earlier point in the movie?

As a director and producer, I will ask these types of questions:
Is there enough in this scene to get a good actor to want to play it?
Is there enough in this scene to get a star out of his trailer?
If an actor asks me “what am I fighting for” in this scene, do I have an answer?
I gotta pay the character actor $2,000 bucks for the week and he’s my sister’s acting coach, so I want this minor character to be drawn distinctively. Is he?
Is the level of conflict in this scene any different from the last scene?
I won’t shoot a scene which only contains exposition, so is there enough conflict to bother with this scene?
Is a character saying what he means? I hope not. Will this dialogue play?
Is there plenty for my DP, Locations people and Set Designer to do?

As an editor:
Does the scene end differently from where it starts?
Given that different parts of the film require distinct pacing, does each scene begin at the last possible point such that it still works?
Did you end the scene at the earliest possible opportunity?
Can you create suspense or mystery by simply excising—or adding—one key piece of information in a scene?
Did you miss the opportunity for a meaningful transition?
Would we miss anything if I cut out all those lines of exposition?
Can I lose that subplot? Or what does that subplot need to be indispensable?

I may never ask you one of these questions explicitly, but I will address all of them and hundreds more. When I find an unsatisfying answer to one of these questions, I give you ways to fix it. I discuss your intention, how it may have failed, how to achieve it, and/or how to modify it. You will know what the problem is and I will offer examples of how to solve it.

As a writer, I’ve been on the other side of the table. I’ve received awful notes. The reasons varied: the note-giver was jealous, was trying to show off, wanted to impress his boss, didn’t understand the script or wanted a completely different script. But have you ever been given a great set of notes? I have. It’s wonderful. I study how people give notes. If your script needs work and you want a highly trained professional to help you improve it, you can afford a script consultant for about the amount a lawyer would charge you to submit your script to half a dozen companies.

I can help you to improve your script. My current clients welcome you to contact them as a reference.

Sincerely,
James P. Mercurio