|
Robert McKee's Story
McKee's long-awaited
book Story has arrived. It is
a chronicle of his story structure
seminar, where he illuminates
the tenets of story and dramatic
structure. His seminar is known
around the world. His 25,000 former
students include the writer's
and/or producers of Forrest Gump,
The Deer Hunter, Seinfeld, M*A*S*H
and Ghandi. McKee covers almost
every imaginable topics relevant
to dramaturgists/storytellers/
screenwriters, and it's possible
that he has put himself out of
the seminar business with this
comprehensive 400+ page tome.
The majority of
the critics of Robert Mckee are
of the philosophy, "Those
who can, do. Those who can't,
teach." But it seems to me
that fans of this adage are people
who can't teach. McKee's alleged
status as a frustrated writer
is irrelevant, because McKee can
teach.
Using an Aristotelian
approach, McKee doesn't prescribe
a theory as much as describe a
set of characteristics that have
worked successfully throughout
the history of Drama. For instance,
McKee points out, all seven playwrights
(of thousands) whose work survived
in the Mediterranean from the
1000 year period from 500 BC to
500 AD each successfully followed
(or fit into) the classic form
he details.
He begins by defining
and examining the smallest unit
of dramatic structure, the beat.
He then begins on a thorough process
of expanding: showing how beats
work together to make scenes;
and how scenes make sequences;
and how sequences make acts; and
how acts make stories/movies.
As the name of the book suggests,
he unapologetically focuses on
Archplot or Classical Design:
"a story built around
an active protagonist who struggles
against primarily external forces
of antagonism to pursue his
desire through continuous time,
within a consistent and causally
connected fictional reality
to a closed ending of absolute
irreversible change."
In fact, his five
steps of dramatic structure (inciting
incident, progressive complications,
crisis, climax and resolution)
may seem like your notes from
eleventh grade drama class. But
the brilliance of this book is
not its revolutionary nature,
but in its systematic explosion,
analysis and microanalysis of
the techniques and their lucid
examples which show how they are
valuable to all writers. For the
reader who believes that the Classical
Design doesn't apply to him/her,
McKee defends the role of Classical
design in all forms of expression
by claiming that most Avant Garde
or Minimalist films ("art
films") are usually defined
by a manipulation of Classical
Design; either by subverting or
minimizing its characteristics.
McKee's attention
to the spine of the story and
the structure is balanced with
an emphasis on content and meaning.
He is a big advocate of research
as the solution to cliches. Most
young writers should heed his
explanation of how the controlling
idea (theme) creates meaning through
structure and action as opposed
to characters' pontificating or
philosophizing. He puts appropriate
emphasis on the crisis (obligatory
scene) and climax as the most
important part of the story to
dramatically and implicitly express
all meaning and ideas.
McKee's reputation
and notoriety may be enough to
get people to listen, but his
real strength is to be able to
lead you logically to the understanding
of his principles. It's almost
like you're conceiving the material
yourself as you read; he brings
to concise elucidation what is
instinct for most. His simple
explanation about why feature-length
films need at least three acts
is so satisfying that it makes
me regret the hours of post-movie
coffee-house chats I had on the
subject. And his concept and definition
of the Negation of the Negation
is a clear-cut analytical tool
to put the forces of antagonism
to the limit in your story.
He illustrates his
points with lucid well-chosen
examples from many films, even
contemporary ones like Slingblade
and Shine. Near the end of the
book, he discusses Cast Design
(character orchestration) and
how minor characters act to bring
out different personality traits
of the protagonist. This is the
one area where I wished he would
have given specific examples from
produced movies.
He follows his section
on story design with a section
on the methods of the successful
writer. McKee believes a writer
should spend months building the
structure of the story, acts,
sequences and scenes before even
trying to write a line of dialogue.
Although his opinion might seem
slightly extreme, he, as always,
posits a convincing argument for
the problems inherent in rushing
into a script without the structure
already in place.
If you're someone
who is afraid to step back and
apply analysis and rigorous thought
to your writing methods, or if
you write brilliantly from pure
instinct and don't want to fiddle
with your success, then don't
look at this book. The breadth
of McKee's analysis can be daunting
at first, but in the last chapter,
he gives a comforting story. He
recounts a story that his father
used to tell him. One day, a humming
bird pointed out to a millipede
that it must be hard to walk with
so many legs. Having never given
thought to something so natural
as walking, the millipede, upon
applying his left side of the
brain to the task, found himself
unable even to move. The story
goes on to show that eventually
the millipede was able to think
about how all of his legs worked
together and he did something
he never did before, dance.
If you take the
time to read this book and savor
its information, and have the
patience to let the information
assimilate from the left-side
of your brain to the right side,
Hollywood Beware.
|